The state of nature, in political theory, is the real or
hypothetical condition of human beings before or without political association
– before government.
Social-contract theorists, such as Thomas Hobbes and John
Locke, relied on this notion to examine the limits and justification of political authority or even, as in the case of
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the legitimacy of human society itself.
Thomas Hobbes’ view
The war of every man against every man sums up how Thomas
Hobbes imagines how life may have been before government.
According to Hobbes; “The state of nature is a state of
incessant mutual exploitation, all individuals seeking to dominate one another
and to acquire honour and profit (fame and fortune)”.
Hobbes believed that human beings in the state of nature
would behave “badly” towards one another.
John Locke’s view
On the other hand, Locke holds a different position to
Hobbes. He believes that people could live in a state of nature, and life would
be possible even without the legally established government. This is according
to Locke would be a harmonic position.
For Locke, by contrast, the state of nature is characterised by the absence of government but not by the absence of mutual obligation. Beyond self-preservation, the law of nature, or reason, also teaches “all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, liberty, or possessions.”(Britannica)
Unlike Hobbes, Locke believed individuals are naturally
endowed with these rights (to life, liberty, and property) and that the state
of nature could be relatively peaceful. Individuals nevertheless agree to form
a commonwealth (and thereby to leave the state of nature) in order to institute
an impartial power capable of arbitrating their disputes and redressing
Though I admire Locke’s thought, I don’t believe the state
of nature would have been a harmonic place.
Hobbes’ way is a call for government. In their true nature, human beings are egoistic, they will always seek to fulfil self-interest. Egoism, the theory that individual interest is the actual motive of all conscious action is the concept behind the theory that human beings do, or should, always act for their own benefit.
This human instinct, along with the phenomenon that there
will always be unlimited wants and limited resources, is the reason why in the
state of nature without laws and regulations man will be against every man
because human beings never get enough.
There is no question that life would or would not be possible in the state of nature. However, it would be short and brutal because every man would want to protect themselves and protect what they may have worked for, even if it means dying for it. In addition, men will seek what interests him.
We need the government for two reasons; the fact that men is egoistic and the fact that the world has limited resources and unlimited wants and/or needs.
Born 1993 January 12, in Pretoria, South Africa. Mduduzi Mbiza is a writer, speaker, researcher, consultant, philosopher and author of the book, ‘Human Education: The Voyage Of Discovery’. He has contributed his articles on education to Daily Maverick, The South African, Voice360 and EduOne.
In 2017 he published his statistical research paper on education titled, ‘Education in Economic Development: South Africa’.
We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.
You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.
You can adjust all of your cookie settings by navigating the tabs on the left hand side.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.